myths and mistakes in new testament textual criticism

It is against this backdrop that this volume makes an invaluable contribution. Even what some might consider to be the arcane discipline of New Testament textual criticism has not been immune from false facts and fake news. 'Sanity, balance, and sober judgment are all qualities that too frequently are lacking in recent discourse. Wallace, Dallas Theological Seminary and Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts) I intend to utilize this volume unapologetically in my introduction as a primary source for several analyses.' (From the foreword by Daniel B. Although Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism is written in clear, user-friendly prose, the contents are well-grounded and perspicacious.

I was happily stunned to see the depth of discussion, the candid examination, and the up-to-date bibliography in each chapter. These young scholars have something to say―not only to Christian speakers and writers but to non-Christian speakers and writers and even to New Testament scholars of all stripes. Meanwhile, the scholarship that is supposedly behind the popular declarations in many an evangelical trade book is out-of-date, misunderstood, or simply ignored. Apologists have had a tendency to regurgitate other apologetic works, which in turn are based on other apologetic works. They observe poignantly that apologetic works on the reliability of the New Testament text have been drifting away from a proper, well-researched, accurately documented scholarship that is anchored to actual data.

The writers are refreshingly honest, and they do not pull their punches. 'The authors in this book offer a necessary corrective to decades of overly exuberant apologetic arguments―arguments that have actually hurt the Christian faith.

Myths and mistakes in new testament textual criticism